Digital transformation isn’t just a distant ambition for laboratories—it’s the daily reality shaping competitive advantage, compliance, and scientific output. In today’s environment of expanding opportunities, it remains important to squeeze out efficiencies wherever possible.

In 2025, chemical and energy lab informatics leaders are recalibrating their strategies with sharper focus than ever before. The convergence of AI readiness, vendor ecosystems, tariffs, and long-term scalability has heightened the need for flexible, future-ready infrastructures.

At CSols, we see this as a pivotal moment for chemical, petrochemical, and energy labs to embrace informatics not just as tools, but as core enablers of agility and resilience. To understand how laboratories are responding, CSols commissioned TrendCandy to survey 156 chemical and energy lab informatics leaders. The results are clear: AI, convergence, and adaptability are reshaping the LIMS roadmap for 2025 and beyond.

Below, we explore four key insights from the research—and what they mean for leaders determined to future proof their labs.

1. AI Readiness and Scalability Take Center Stage

When asked about the top motivators for system change or enhancement, 77% of chemical and energy lab informatics leaders pointed to AI readiness, edging out scalability (74%), process improvement (70%), and even compliance pressures (65%). The headline here is striking: compliance, once the perennial driver, has been eclipsed by growth-oriented goals.

This signals a profound mindset shift. Labs are no longer focused solely on defensive positioning; instead, they’re looking to harness AI to generate insights, optimize throughput, and anticipate disruptions before they occur. With 83% now declaring AI readiness as a must-have in LIMS and data platforms, AI has moved from differentiator to baseline expectation.

CSols understands that scalability and AI readiness are inseparable. AI initiatives demand well-structured data, standardized metadata, and flexible architectures—elements that only scalable systems can sustain. Our takeaway: labs that invest in both simultaneously will find themselves not just keeping pace with change but actively setting the industry agenda.

2. 2026: The Year of System Convergence

The survey shows that 57% of lab leaders expect 2026 to mark a pivotal year for consolidating LIMS, ELN, and SDMS into unified frameworks. This anticipated convergence underscores a broader industry trend: the need for holistic, cross-platform data management that eliminates silos.

So, why does this matter? Because informatics systems that operate in isolation limit visibility and hinder operational agility. By contrast, convergence allows data lakes, analytics, and AI to draw from a consistent, accessible foundation. The implications are significant—labs will not only reduce data transfer headaches but also realize new efficiencies in compliance monitoring, audit readiness, and cross-team collaboration.

CSols has seen this reality play out in countless implementations. Those who approach convergence strategically—planning integration layers, APIs, and governance frameworks in advance—achieve smoother transitions and higher returns on investment. For leaders preparing for 2026, now is the time to align stakeholders, build consensus, and formalize roadmaps that anticipate convergence rather than react to it.

3. Vendor (In)Flexibility as a Dealbreaker

Among the most telling survey findings: 81% of lab leaders flagged vendor technology limitations as a likely trigger for 2025 upgrades, while 77% cited vendor inflexibility as a probable driver for enhancements. In an era of rapid AI expansion and tariff-induced disruptions, rigidity is simply unacceptable.

The consequences of poor vendor adaptability are clear. Single-vendor dependence is widespread—64% of labs rely on a single vendor for LIMS, ELN, and SDMS—and 72% of those struggle to adapt to emerging needs. Meanwhile, 37% of managers expect to switch vendors during upgrades, with 65% pointing to poor post-implementation support as the catalyst.

The lesson is twofold. First, the vendor selection process must weight long-term flexibility as heavily as current functionality. Second, vendor partnerships should be scrutinized for support quality, upgrade pathways, and openness (such as APIs and partner networks). At CSols, we’ve seen firsthand that labs who prioritize adaptability and ecosystem strength in vendor decisions are better equipped to sustain growth and navigate disruption.

4. Tariffs and Market Volatility as Catalysts for Change

One-third of labs reported that tariffs and regulatory shifts had delayed critical technology projects. Beyond delays, tariffs are also reshaping sourcing: 31% have already switched to domestic materials, while 78% have reallocated budgets and 74% renegotiated contracts. The message is clear: external market forces now directly dictate internal innovation timelines.

Interestingly, these disruptions are not slowing transformation—they’re accelerating it. Labs are responding by increasing data-driven decision-making (65%), implementing new technologies (64%), and standardizing workflows (42%). Tariffs, once perceived as obstacles, are now forcing resilience and driving adoption of digital solutions. For example, 37% of labs added tariff-related metadata fields to LIMS this year, embedding compliance and sourcing safeguards directly into their informatics infrastructure.

For CSols, the implication is obvious: resilience and compliance are no longer side benefits of informatics investments—they are central outcomes. By weaving tariff risk tracking, metadata enrichment, and supply chain visibility into LIMS and related platforms, labs can turn volatility into strategic advantages.

Why Roadmaps, Governance, and KPIs Still Matter

Beyond these headline shifts, the survey highlights a familiar yet vital truth: successful informatics transformations depend on disciplined governance. Labs with formal roadmaps are 54% more likely to stay on budget and 58% more likely to achieve user satisfaction targets. Similarly, 51% of labs that integrated KPIs into dashboards realized measurable gains within six months.

These findings reinforce what CSols has advocated for decades: technology alone is not enough. Structured planning, clear KPIs, and strong change management are the guardrails that keep projects on course. Without them, labs risk underutilization, scope drift, and missed ROI.

The Strategic Imperative for 2025 and Beyond

Taken together, the survey results depict an industry in rapid evolution. AI readiness is now mandatory. Convergence is looming. Vendor rigidity is a dealbreaker. Tariffs and regulations are active forces shaping roadmaps. And yet, amidst this turbulence, a clear path emerges: treating informatics as a strategic lever—not a tactical necessity—positions organizations to thrive.

At CSols, our role is to help labs navigate these shifts with clarity and confidence. From roadmap design and vendor evaluation to AI enablement and change management, we provide the expertise to turn survey insights into real-world outcomes.

2025 has tested the agility of every laboratory. The question is not whether disruption will come—it already has. The question is whether labs will respond with reactive patches or strategic foresight. With the right informatics foundation, the answer can—and should—be foresight.

Want to know how your lab compares to those in the survey? Take the assessment.

‍